|
What degree of control is required? Is the surface area of the tank of prime consideration? Should the design include additional CFM to ventilate parts as they are removed from the tank? Is total control of the fume required? Is a push/pull design practical for your application?
Before CFM volumes can be assigned to the various process tanks, the intent or purpose of the exhaust system has to be defined. Only after you have answered the above questions, can you begin to design a system that will insure a profitable operation and provide a safe environment for your employees.
OSHA Guide 1910, page 20, Section (7), (iv) states "The exhaust system, consisting of hoods, ducts, air mover, and discharge outlet, shall be designed in accordance with American National Standard Fundamentals Governing the Design and Operation of Local Exhaust systems, Z9.2- 1960, or the manual, Industrial Ventilation, published by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 1970." These manuals have long been used as the industry standard for designing exhaust system volumes for open surface tanks. In most cases these standards are fine, but no distinction is made between allocation of exhaust volume to vent the tank surface vs venting work in process.
Because there are so many variables to consider when designing an exhaust system, it is not uncommon to see a broad range of CFM volumes from various manufacturers. The first impact of an exhaust system is the initial cost of the system. A careful evaluation of all cost variables entering into the exhaust system should be made if maximum economy is to be achieved. The designer has a great influence on these costs when specifying the duct system material, total CFM, system operating pressure, duct size and complexity, fan horse power, control device and space requirements.
Determining factors are air quantity and system total pressure. For example, it has been determined that based on 6 cents per Kw/Hr cost of electrical energy, an exhaust system costs 2 cents per cfm, per 1/4 inch static pressure. Therefore, a 1/4 inch rise in static pressure for a 100,000 CFM system would add $2,000.00 to the cost of operation for a one year period. Some time-proven practices for keeping cost down are:
Keep the air quantity to a minimum. This is accomplished by totally enclosing the tank, using a push/pull system or enclosing as much area around the exhaust hood as possible (do not compromise on the exhaust volume to the point where you are under the minimum required control velocity to maintain the specified contaminant evolution for the process involved). Use the minimum number of fittings possible. A short radius elbow for example could have the loss equivalent to 29 feet of straight duct. Use materials that are compatible with the environment. Select a control device that yields the required efficiency at the lowest possible pressure drop.
^Back to top^
The current edition of the Industrial Ventilation Manual offers two basic methods for calculating exhaust volumes for ventilation systems.
METHOD 1
Push/Pull - A push/pull ventilation system (see fig.1) utilizes a nozzle that pushes a jet of air across the tank surface into an exhaust hood. Effectiveness of the push jet is a function of its momentum which can be related to the product of the nozzle supply air flow and the nozzle exit velocity. The manual offers technical justification for ventilating the surface of a process tank with an exhaust volume of 75 CFM/ ft2 of tank surface area.
The exhaust slot or slots should be within a height of .14 times the tank width (or the distance from the push header to the exhaust slot) to effectively capture the push jet volume as it moves across the tank surface.
Cross draft velocities in excess of 75 ft/min, high temperatures or wide tanks (8 feet or more) may require increased push and/or pull flows. To account for the effects of these variables, a ± 20% flow adjustment should be designed into both the push and pull flow systems wherever practical. When ventilation of the processing parts is desired, additional CFM volumes must be allocated to the upper hood slots on upright, multi- slotted hoods. It some cases it is necessary to add a second, elevated push header to direct flow towards the upper slot. Any shielding of the hoods and/or hoist will drastically improve the exhaust hood performance.
Push Air Header - The push air header should be located as near the tank edge as possible to minimize the height above the liquid level. The push air header should be round so it can be rotated and adjusted during start-up. The nozzle axis can be angled down a maximum of 20† to permit the jet to clear obstructions.
Any opening between the nozzle and tank lip should be sealed. For most applications a 1/4" diameter hole on 1-1/2" to 2" centers is sufficient. Use 11 to 12 CFM respectively for every one foot in length. The push header diameter should be 2 to 3 times the area of the nozzle exit area. Supply lines to push air headers should be equipped with a gate or diaphragm valve for best control. Size the main trunkline for 3,000 to 5,000 FPM velocity. Finally, a high pressure blower should be selected to power the system. Calculate the pressure drop across the system and choose the appropriate blower for the job.
METHOD 2
Straight Exhaust - Prior to using 75 CFM/ft2 in conjunction with a push/pull system, the most common method of exhaust volume calculation was to use the tables as outlined in the A.C.G.I.H. manual, section 10. Tables can be used for general calculations. For more detailed information, refer to the A.C.G.I.H. manual.
- Obtain the recommended control velocity for the selected operation from Table I
- Determine width to length ratio by dividing width of tank (distance slot has to pull) by length of tank.
- Select CFM/ ft2 based on control velocity and W to L ratio from Table II.
- Calculate exhaust volume as product of CFM/ft2 X surface area of tank (see Table II).
EXAMPLE
|
Given:
|
Chrome Plating Tank 6' x 2'-6"
Free standing in room
No cross drafts
|
|
A:
|
Hood MSL along 6' side.
Hood on free standing tank
W = 2'-6"; L = 6'; W/L = 0.42
Surface area = 6' x 2'-6" = 15 ft/2
|
|
B:
|
Process - Chrome Plating
Control velocity - 150 fpm (from Table I)
Minimum exhaust rate - 250 cfm/ft2 (from Table II)
Minimum exhaust volume - 15 x 250 = 3,750 cfm.
|
This method of CFM calculation can also be used in conjunction with a push air system with either a single slot hood or a multi-slotted hood. Depending on the process, the total calculated exhaust volume can be reduced by 20% to 50%. A minimum of 75 cfm/ft2 of tank surface area ( ± 20%) should be allocated to the bottom slot with the remainder allocated to the top slot or slots. This will work fine for low production operations with low temperature tanks.
High production operations with high temperature and/or aggressive chemicals should have additional CFM allocated to the top slots for better control of fumes as the parts exit the tank. Shielding between the hoods and/or under the hoist will drastically improve the performance of the exhaust system.
Push air volume can be calculated in the same manner as described under Push/Pull section on these pages.
NOTES:
The effective width (W) over which a hood must pull air to operate is critical to its performance. If the hood face is set back from the tank lip, include this set back in measuring tank width. It is not practical to ventilate across the long dimension of a tank if the W/L exceeds 2.0. It is undesirable to do so when W/L exceeds 1.0.
- If W= 20 to 30 inches, a hood on one side is suitable.
- If W= 31 to 36 inches, a hood on both sides is desirable (ref. push/pull design).
- If W= 36 to 48 inches, a hood on both sides is necessary unless all conditions are optimum (ref. push/pull design).
- If W= 48 inches or greater, local exhaust is not practical. A push air system or enclosure should be considered.
- Duct velocity = 2,000 to 3,400 fpm.
- Maximum hood plenum velocity = 2,000 fpm.
- Entry loss = 1.78 VP plus duct entry loss.
- Maximum hood slot velocity = 3,000 fpm.
- Hood lengths 6 ft. or greater, multiple take-offs are desirable. Hood lengths 10 ft. or greater, multiple take-offs are necessary.
TABLE 1: MINIMUM CONTROL VELOCITY (FPM)
| OPERATION |
PROCESS |
CONTROL VELOCITY |
CONTROL DEVICE RECOMMENDED |
OPERATION |
PROCESS |
CONTROL VELOCITY |
CONTROL DEVICE RECOMMENDED |
| PLATING |
Cadmium
Chrome
Copper
Tin
Zinc |
50
150
75
75
75 |
[note 1]
Yes
Yes
[note 1]
[note 1] |
CLEANING
(not boiling)
CLEANING
(boiling)
BRIGHT DIP |
Caustic
Electrolytic
Caustic
Electrolytic
Aluminum |
75
75
100
100
150 |
[note 1]
[note 1]
[note 1]
[note 1]
Yes [note 2] |
| ANODIZING |
Sulfuric
Chromic |
100
100 |
Yes
Yes |
STRIPPING> |
Copper
Brass |
150
150 |
Yes [note 2]
Yes [note 2] |
| PICKLING |
Nitric
Sulfuric
Hydrochloric
Nitric/HF |
150
100
150
150 |
Yes [note 2]
Yes
Yes [note 2]
Yes [note 2] |
HOT WATER |
Nitric
Sodium Hydrochloric
Sulfuric
Not boiling
Boiling |
150
75
75
50
75 |
Yes [note 2]
Yes
Yes |
NOTES
-
In most cases a scrubber is not required [Mapco recommends the installation of a mist eliminator to prevent damage to building, cars and surrounding structures].
-
Additional control should be considered due to the violent reaction of some processes.
TABLE 2: MINIMUM RATE, CFM/ft2 OF TANK AREA FOR LATERAL EXHAUST
Required Minimum Control
Velocity
(FPM) |
CFM/ft2 to maintain minimum control
velocities at following ratios:
tank width (W)
tank length (L) |
| 0.0 - 0.09 |
0.1 - 0.24 |
0.25 - 0.49 |
0.5 - 0.99 |
1.0 - 2.0 |
Hood along one side or two parallel sides of tank when tank is against a wall or shielded. Also for manifold along tank centerline.
50
75
100
150 |
50
75
100
150 |
60
90
125
190 |
75
110
150
225 |
90
130
175
250 |
100
150
200
250 |
Hood along one side or two parallel sides of free standing tank.
50
75
100
150 |
75
100
150
225 |
90
130
175
250 |
100
150
200
250 |
110
170
225
250 |
125
190
250
250 |
NOTES
- Use W/2 as tank width in computing W/L for hood along centerline or two parallel sides of tank.
- If hood face is set back from tank, distance should be included in tank width dimension.
^Back to top^
When the intended purpose of the process exhaust has been established, the proper exhaust hood can be selected.
Lip exhaust, single-slot hoods are ideal for ventilating the process tank surface. This design will do little or nothing for capture of fumes evolving from parts as they move above the capture range of the exhaust slot. Lip exhaust hoods work well with a push system as long as the slot, or slots are within a height of .14 times tank width and obstructions are kept to a minimum. When a push-pull system is not practical, lip exhaust on opposing sides of the tank may be the best alternative. Keep in mind that the effective range of each slot is approximately 30". Beyond this point, capture velocity drops off significantly.
Upright, multi-slotted hoods are required when parts are to be ventilated. If the system design requires a push system, the lowest slot on the hood will be assigned the function of ventilating the tank surface with the help of the push jet. Upper slots will require additional CFM volume for the express purpose of ventilating parts. The height of the top slot is usually determined by the depth of the tank or height of the parts when they have cleared the tank. Processing of large parts or barrel lines usually require an elevated slot to vent the parts or barrel. A second, elevated push header will increase the efficiency of the exhaust when this is the case. Control of process fumes becomes increasingly more difficult as the fumes rise higher above the tank surface. Cross drafts created by negative pressure in the building or drafts created by hoist and part movement make it nearly impossible to capture all of the fumes.
Canopy hoods are not practical on open-surface process tanks unless two or three sides can be shielded or enclosed. In most cases the required CFM volume for this arrangement is greater than other hood designs.
In any case, the quantity of air in cubic feet per minute necessary to be exhausted through an enclosing hood shall not be less than the product of the control velocity times the net area of all openings in the enclosure through which air can flow.
Specialized designs exist for low-volume capture of surface fumes that enlist the aid of manual, automatic or permanent tank covers. Practical tank cover designs (or design limitations) are usually dictated by the specific process and the type of material transfer system used. Low-volume, efficient capture of fumes, arising from parts can be achieved with a ventilated workload enclosure or traveling canopy hood with side shields.
Design parameters for these types of systems are too complicated or operation-specific to be covered in this manual.
^Back to top^
Mapco air pollution control systems are designed in accordance with the recommended standards of ACGIH, ANSI, SPI, OSHA and SMACNA. Depending on the process, we may choose to use values higher than those recommended in the above manuals. |